‘Something can be utilized as foundation for impeachment,’ says Gutierrez

The camp of Vice President Leni Robredo is poised to seek legal action against the journalists and news organizations that ran a fake story about the presidential candidate, with his spokesperson saying on Monday that it is dangerous to let these actions be the norm. gutierrez impeachment

Atty. Barry Gutierrez, spokesperson of Vice President Leni Robredo. INQUIRER.web file photograph / Noy Morcoso

MANILA, Philippines — Can a future choice by the Supreme Court docket (SC) be used as grounds for impeaching an elected official?

In response to regulation professor and former Workplace of the Vice President (OVP) spokesperson Barry Gutierrez, something can be utilized as a foundation for pursuing an impeachment criticism, as the method is political.

In a press release on Tuesday, Gutierrez defined that they imagine that the present OVP beneath Vice President Sara Duterte dedicated an error when it requested for and accepted P125 million value of confidential funds (CF) throughout the latter a part of 2022 when the unique funds crafted beneath former Vice President Leni Robredo didn’t have an entry for secret funds.

Gutierrez was OVP spokesperson when Robredo’s workplace submitted its budgetary request for 2022 earlier than the Might 2022 nationwide elections and earlier than Robredo ended her time period on June 30, 2022.

“Our argument in our petition is that there was a switch value P125 million.  That is the availability which grants the facility of the purse solely to Congress and that provision governs the transfers of appropriations between workplaces,” Gutierrez stated.

“So we predict there was a violation of this provision however on the finish, solely the Supreme Court docket can say if there was certainly a violation.  Now if you happen to’ll ask if it may be used as a foundation for impeachment, something can be utilized as a foundation for impeachment,” he added.

Gutierrez was one of many legal professionals who requested the Supreme Court docket final November 7 to declare the P125 million CF with OVP in 2022 as unconstitutional.

“If they might select to border that there have been provisions violated within the fund switch, then that may stand as a foundation and on the finish, solely a 1/3 vote of the members of the Home of Representatives can say if it has foundation,” he claimed.

Throughout the discussions on the 2024 proposed nationwide funds on the Home, Duterte’s CF requests have been completely mentioned upon the prodding of Minority lawmakers.  It was then revealed that Duterte’s OVP spent P125 million beneath confidential and extraordinary bills.

The questions got here months after OVP launched reviews on their funds utilization for 2022, amid questions from the media in regards to the supposed confidential funds it spent.

In a message to reporters, the OVP despatched a screenshot of a funds sheet’s portion referred to as “Abstract of appropriations, obligations, disbursements, and balances by object of expenditures,” which detailed bills akin to personnel bills and journey spending.

Nonetheless, a portion of the funds that the OVP gave was blotted out.  Finally, OVP clarified that it had meant to focus on the portion of the confidential fund, and never block it.

The highlighted portion confirmed a provision beneath “Particular Objective Funds.” Underneath the stated class was a sub-category of “Contingent Fund,” which contained Confidential Bills amounting to P125 million.

READ: OVP insists: ‘Confidential fund has been utilized appropriately’

Since then, a number of Minority lawmakers claimed that the fund transfers are unlawful.  In response to Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Lagman, “the 1987 Structure prohibits switch of funds besides with respect to constitutional officers just like the President relative to financial savings for augmentation.”

Nonetheless, the Division of Price range and Administration and Marikina 2nd District Rep. Stella Quimbo clarified that the CF was not a fund switch, however was somewhat sourced from contingent funds and was positioned in a line merchandise of the OVP’s 2022 funds.

READ: DBM says OVP’s 2022 confidential funds technically not a fund switch — Co

Regardless of the seeming feud between Duterte and the Home — after the chamber reallocated OVP’s proposed P500 million CF for 2024 and the Division of Training’s P150 million CF request — key lawmakers have denied pushing for an impeachment criticism in opposition to the Vice President.

READ: Speaker Romualdez denies impeachment strikes vs Sara Duterte at Home

ACT Academics party-list Rep. France Castro, who at one level stated that impeaching Duterte was a risk, stated that the impeachment talks have been simply informal discussions between lawmakers.

On the finish of the day, Gutierrez stated that the method of impeachment stays to be political.

“It’s political within the sense that on the finish, what would decide if an impeachment criticism would prosper or not are numbers on the Home of Representatives and on the Senate,” he stated.

Your subscription couldn’t be saved. Please strive once more.

Your subscription has been profitable.

READ: Restrain use of secret funds

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *